Synergetics is an interdisciplinary theoretical approach that studies self-organization in complex systems(systems that are characterized by openness, dynamics, and complexity). It was developed by physicist Hermann Haken(1969) through his research experiments on laser light. He noticed unpredictable patterns emerging that cannot be explained by linear models. The properties of light change in a self-organized manner when the laser reaches a critical point or “laser threshold”, and such emergent order sets the control parameter which enslaves the system.
(This is an updated post)
For a real explanation, listen directly from the master: Hermann Haken
Synergetics and Entrepreneurship
My initial exposure to synergetics started in a negative light because of reading Jeffrey Goldstein’s article in which he stressed his radical construction point of view. He argues;
“Although these connotations of self-organization have provided a corrective to the outdated belief that novel order in a system can only come about through the imposition of external order, a careful inspection of research in complexity theory reveals that the emergence of new order is more appropriately constructed rather than self-organized as such (Goldstein 2003).”EMERGENCE, CREATIVITY, AND THE LOGIC OF FOLLOWING AND NEGATING by Goldstein’ 2015
Goldstein further specifically pointed to Haken; in that he adds;
“An example is that much touted emblem of self-organization, the laser with its property of ultra-focused coherence (see Haken, 1981). In actuality, though, laser light hardly comes about either spontaneously or through inner direction. On the contrary, it requires the most stringent of laboratory manipulations and constraints (see a list of these in Strogatz, 2003). An examination of other examples of self-organization reveals a similar constructional nature of emergent phenomena (see, e.g., Nicolis, 1989)”EMERGENCE, CREATIVITY, AND THE LOGIC OF FOLLOWING AND NEGATING by Goldstein’ 2015
Andreas Liening of TU Dortmund
- Complexity and Entrepreneurship: Modeling the Process of Entrepreneurship Education with the Theory of Synergetics
- Synergetics—Fundamental Attributes of the Theory of Self-Organization and Its Meaning for Economics(OPEN Access)
Although I am extremely interested in reading anything relating to entrepreneurship and complexity, I totally disagree with the “Entrepreneurship Mindset” as the purpose view in the paper promoted by Liening. To see my reasons check this, this, this, this, this and this
It is very easy to fall into the trap of traditional representative cognitive psychology and its lazy dependence on decontextualized hard or impossible to define concepts. It is worse when you are an outsider looking at education and learning science for the first time. Check my earlier blogposts. All or most of them were from this reductionistic cognitive science perspective.
It is essential to read people whom we disagree with, but a serious issue arises when we start to blindly believe everything they say. Especially true if one doesn’t have the necessary expertise and diversity in hs or her system to figure out the flaws of the argument.
Paul A. Kirschner who is one of the most reductionist of all the education scholars with his famous works like, “Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work” is also famous for his work on learning in complexity, ” Ten steps to complex learning”.
This points to serious issues with the application of synergetics in particular and complexity science in general.
- Those with domain expertise may use complexity to fit in with their long-accumulated path dependency.
- They may use a complexity tag to avoid being called a reductionist.
- Those with complexity background may fall for the obvious and visible part of domain knowledge.
- Those with ideas and tools to sell will fit in a much less uncertain version of complexity;.
- As often pointed out by people like Dave Snowden, those with a complexity background, especially those associated with mathematical modeling and Santa Fe may assume that they can model human complexity by developing agent-based models as they do for some idealized version of Ant behavior. This can be viewed as a reductionistic tendency inside the complexity sciences (http://www.human-current.com/archived-episodes/tag/anthrocomplexity)
All the above can be viewed as going against the ethics of complexity, especially when proposed as solutions for other people.
According to Synergetics Philosophers Helena Knyazeva and Sergey Kurdyumov, “The synergetic assertions can apply to many scientific disciplines. They are functioning on the level from which a great scope of scientific disciplines can be embraced. However, such an approach has also a negative side. The higher the level of the view is the less concrete details can be distinguished. On the other hand, the deeper we penetrate particular details the less place seems to remain for synergetics itself” They adds; “Synergetics can provide us only with general frames of consideration, a mental scheme or a heuristic approach to a concrete scientific investigation. Concrete applications of synergetic models to complex human or social systems presuppose further detailed scientific investigations. Such investigations can be carried out only by the use of a profound knowledge of a certain disciplinary field and/or with a close collaboration with specialists in a corresponding scientific discipline. Thus, synergetics gives a certain approach or a direction of research, or, to put it in terms of psychology, a scientific attitude. The rest is the matter of every concrete investigation”
Some interesting articles by Russian philosopher Helena Knyazeva on synergetics are attached