This was one of the longest debate I ever had on twitter. Even after the debate I am struggling to get clarity regarding the logic of existence of such a massive number(multiplicity) of perspectives, definitions and analogies for a seemingly simple concept like TOL
Category: Transfer Of Learning
-
Tweet: How to study to maximize performance ?
How to study to maximize performance | Elizabeth Bjork & Robert Bjork | … https://t.co/63aTqiCF5n via @YouTube
— Kiran Johny (@johnywrites) July 12, 2019https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
The concept of “desirable difficulties” was developed by Robert Bjork of UCLA. In his research he noticed various kinds of experimental phenomena which indicated the emergence of 2 predominant patterns in learning .- Conditions of instruction or practice (learning) that make performance improve rapidly often fail to support long term retention and transfer. Whereas,
- Conditions of instruction or practice(learning) that appear to create difficulties for the learner, slowing the rate of apparent learning, often optimizes long term retention and transfer.
The first one accelerate the learning(Or speeds up learning), the second one slows down learning by introducing difficulties which benefits long term retention and transfer.
-
Tweet: Expertise is not a single skill
“Expertise is not a single skill; it is a collection of skills, and the same professional may be highly expert in some of the tasks in her domain while remaining a novice in others.”
— Kiran Johny (@johnywrites) September 3, 2018
Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow#Skill #SkillAcquisition #Learninghttps://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
Expertise is not a single skill; it is a collection of skills, and the same professional may be highly expert in some of the tasks in her domain while remaining a novice in others.” Daniel Kahneman
Because expertise is not a single skill but a collection of multiple skills, its is suggested to deconstruct the big skill into its component forms. Eg, Divide a language learning into multiple bit sized sub-skills and tackle each of it separately.
While many research findings shows that such separation may lead to weak transfer of skills to performance conditions, It is still the most popular method of learning in many instances because of its ability to give fast results.
Following is a video in which Tim Ferriss, author of The 4-Hour Workweek talk about his skill deconstruction method of DiSSS, which contains the following process:
- D – Deconstruction (+ identify)
- S – Selection (+ simplify)
- S – Sequencing (+ optimize fundamental elements)
- S – Stakes (+ motivation/importance/consequence)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSq9uGs_z0E
In the following video Author Josh Kaufman reveals a new approach for acquiring new skills quickly with just a small amount of practice each day. He also advocates deconstruction as a powerful strategy.
Variable practice on the other hand, is becoming more prevalent in sport(motor) training in which transfer to real game conditions are more important than fast learning of skills. More and more studies are proving that variable practice is very powerful in motor perceptual and cognitive learning conditions.
Many scientific studies have revealed that unless practice includes a randomized element, it effects the transfer to the course. Here Alex Nicolson discusses variable practice(randomized) applied to Golf.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7520tQdrOc
-
Tweet: Block practice vs Randomize practice.
Mastering skill Vs Transferring skills
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.jsThe Key to Mastering ANY Skill (Science of Basketball Skill Development) https://t.co/qTwsV6iGsJ via @YouTube
— Kiran Johny (@johnywrites) August 5, 2018Block practice is basically the same thing over and over again.
Randomized practice includes switching it up and adding more variables.
Block practice is the best way to master skill. But randomize practice is the best way to get a skill to actually transfer over to a game.
Blocked practice alone is not going to transfer to a game. But if you move to randomize practice too early in the program you end up becoming really good at transferring skills that aren’t yet maximized.
-
Tweet: The importance of novelty in learning and attention is well documented
Apes social attention.,avoid static information and focus on the dynamic significant one https://t.co/cCyXzkANFm
— Kiran Johny (@johnywrites) September 6, 2017https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
Several theories have suggested that novelty elicits a learning signal (Kormi-Nouri et al., 2005, Lisman and Grace, 2005, Meeter et al., 2005, Recce and Harris, 1996, Tulving and Kroll, 1995).Novelty can help orient our attention, releasing neuromodulators in the brain that can increase engagement and promote learning.Novel contexts can help engage students with a new topic, or help encourage them to practice the freshly learned knowledge in new scenarios, which is important for consolidating their understanding, memory, and transfer of that knowledge. Topics that engage curiosity have been shown to stimulate activities in the brain’s reward regions (Min Jeong et al., 2009).Studies have shown that novel stimulus sets off a cascade of brain responses, activating several neuromodulatory systems in humans. As a consequence novelty has a wide range of effects on cognition, This include pro-learning capabilities like :- Improving perception and action,
- Increasing motivation,
- Eliciting exploratory behavior,
Thus Promoting learning.Further, spatial novelty may trigger the dopaminergic mesolimbic system, promoting dopamine release in the hippocampus, having longer-lasting effects, up to tens of minutes, on motivation, reward processing, and learning and memory.